Ap Lab 9 Transpiration

(5): Contrasting Indicadoresde

Indicator no. 1: Process analytical reports for decision making at the tactical level

No.1 indicator Operability:

PRATDNT = Process analytical reports required for decision-making tactical level: 0 = not processed
(0%) required analytical reports for decision making at the tactical level
1 = Process about 25% of analytical reports for decision making at the tactical level
2 = Process about 50% of the required analytical reports for decision making at the tactical level
3 = Process about 75% of the required analytical reports for decision making at the tactical level

4 = Process approximately 100% of the required analytical reports for decision making at the tactical level

indicator measurement technique no. 1:

interviews with questionnaires to the heads or senior

Objective

indicator no. 1:

know if the information processing system of analytical reports for decision making at the tactical level in the area of \u200b\u200bthe company

Indicator no. 2: Identify Problems in the Tactical and Strategic Level

indicator Operability N º 2:

PNTNE = Problems identified in the strategic and tactical level
0 = not identified PNTNE
1 = Identifies few PNTNE (25%)
2 = Identifies PNTNE regular (50%) 3 = Identifies
than regular PNTNE (75%)

4 = Identify all PNTNE at a satisfactory level (100%)

Technical Measurement of the indicator no. 2:

interviews with questionnaires to the heads or senior

Indicator Target no. 2:

determine the stage of identifying problems in tactical and strategic levels in the area of \u200b\u200bthe company

Indicator no. 3: Identify internal and external factors affecting the area positively or negatively

Operability indicator # 3:

Internal Factors FIE = positive or negative yExternos
0 = No identifies FIE (0%) 1 = Identifies
few FIE (25%) 2 = Identifies regular
FIE (50%) 3 = Identifies
than regular FIE (75%)
4 = Identify all FIE to a satisfactory level ( 100%)

indicator measurement technique no. 3: Survey
and Analysis of Reports on Internal and External Factors and weaknesses of the area

Objective indicator no. 3:

To identify internal and external factors that positively or negatively affected area

Indicator no. 4: Identify indicators of organizational culture in the area

nro.4 indicator Operability:

ICO = Organizational Culture Indicators
0 = not identified ICO (0%) 1 = Identifies
little ICO (25%) 2 = Identifies regular
ICO (50%) 3 = Identifies
than regular ICO (75%)
ICO 4 = If you identify a satisfactory level (100% )

indicator measurement technique no. 4:

Survey and Analysis of Papers on Organizational Culture

area

Indicator Target no. 4:
know if the SI is being implemented organizational culture indicators area

Indicator no. 5: Model Tasks in the tactical and strategic level in the area

nro.5 indicator Operability:
MTNTNE = Model Tasks in the Strategic and Tactical Level
0 = No modeling tasks in tactical and strategic levels (0%) 1 = Model
little tasks in tactical and strategic levels (25%) 2 = Model
regular tasks at the tactical level and / or strategic (50%) 3 = Model
than regular tasks (75%)
4 = If you model all the tasks required (100%)

Measurement Technique indicator no. 5: Survey and Analysis
Documents tasks at the tactical level and strategic

Indicator Target no. 5:

assess whether the information system taking into account the modeling tasks at the tactical and strategic area

Indicator no. 6: Degree of satisfaction of the head of the area by the System Operability

nro.6 indicator:

GSJA = Degree of Satisfaction of the head of the area. You can take the following values:
0 - Not at all satisfied (0%)
1 = very satisfied (25%)
2 = Regular (50%)
3 = Satisfied (75%)
4 = Very Satisfied (100%)

indicator measurement technique no. 6: Survey

Indicator Target no. 6:
assess whether the chief of the area is satisfied by the Information System before applying and after applying IPM

Indicator no. 7: Apply strategic map strategic objectives

indicator Operability N º 7: Strategic Map

ME = 0 = not prepared by the ME (0%)
1 = ME is developed but it covers some requirements (25%)
2 = ME is manufactured from a middle (50%) 3 =
prepared by the ME to a satisfactory level (75%)
4 = ME is manufactured from a highly satisfactory level (100%)

indicator measurement technique no. 7: Survey

Indicator Target no. 7:

evaluate if applicable Strategic Map the research area

Indicator no. 8: Apply the Balanced Scorecard indicators

indicator Operability N º 8:
IBSC = Balanced Scorecard Indicators
drawn 0 = No IBSC (0%) 1 = Make
few IBSC approximately 25% 2 = Make regular
IBSC
approximately 50% 3 = Make more regular about 75% IBSC
4 = Make all the IBSC assessment requirements covering approximately 100%

Measurement Technique Indicator no. 8: Survey

Indicator Target no. 8: Evaluate if applied
Indicators of the Balanced Scorecard (IBSC)